Open salim-b opened 1 year ago
I am not sure actually. Footnotes are not described in the gfm spec. I can imagine they are considered content, not markup, and hence get retained in plain text.
Either way, you have to ask this upstream in https://github.com/github/cmark-gfm . We don't control this form the R bindings.
The recently introduced footnote support via param
footnotes
does not work as one would expect forcommonmark::markdown_text()
. For all other Markdown features (like emphasizing, links etc.), they are stripped bycommonmark::markdown_text()
since regular text has no notion of markup.But the footnotes remain:
Created on 2023-03-29 with reprex v2.0.2
Is this really the intended behaviour?