Closed pachadotdev closed 4 months ago
@krlmlr hi, this allows u to vendor to src/vendor! @hadley i keep the unlink() function in vendor.R examples to pass the local check(), but that then creates problems with pkgdown
Thanks. I'd wait for a comment on if we want to vendor into src/vendor
at all. Perhaps there's a reason for vendoring into inst/include
?
Thanks. I'd wait for a comment on if we want to vendor into
src/vendor
at all. Perhaps there's a reason for vendoring intoinst/include
?
what i saw with check(), is that it doesn't like to put files in src, but if i vendor in src/vendor in a pkg project, it passes all checks for that another pkg
Let's not spend too much time here for now?
The checks in this PR are failing
This PR seems to have a bit of noise
We don't know the maintainers' perspective on if this PR is a good, so I'm not sure if it's worth addressing the first two issues at all
Let's not spend too much time here for now?
sure, i was following from the vendoring in https://github.com/r-dbi/RPostgres/tree/main/src/vendor/boost
340 but without the breaking changes