Open javieriserte opened 1 month ago
Does the following work for you?
c("1", "2", "3", "4") |>
sapply(
function(x) x |> runif() |> mean()
) |>
as.character()
I think linting he inner pipeline could be made optional. Personally I prefer keeping the lint because regardless of syntax, discerning the multiple pipe characters in one line is hard on my eyes.
discerning the multiple pipe characters in one line is hard on my eyes.
I agree, but for this we already have https://github.com/r-lib/lintr/blob/73e55d31f6ead2908fcd9a49d6ccf46524b1cccc/R/nested_pipe_linter.R
I'll mark this as "help wanted" as I'm not sure it's worth the effort, but if this is driving you nuts feel free to have a go at it.
Thank you!,
I'll look into it.
Keeping this open to track the false positive
When a piece of code has two pipes, one nested inside another like in example code below:
the linter produces a false positive:
I think that the linter may consider the expression like a single pipe, instead of two nested pipes.
I'm using lintr 3.1.2.