Open lionel- opened 4 years ago
Would it make sense to copy the package without the revdep
folder somewhere inside revdep
or in a temporary folder before installing?
Adding broken package and relaunching checks when there are hundreds of results in checks.noindex
is very painful at the moment.
Yeah, that would be a good workaround for now, until pkgbuild or base R will get better at ignoring files.
I had strange revdep failures because the installation of the DEV version silently failed. The
new
folder for the tested package was empty, and the revdeps were then checked against an old version installed in the system library.Checking that the package was correctly installed in old and new with the expected versions would help catch these problems early and would also increase our confidence that
remotes
etc are working properly during the revdep checks.