Release {styler} v1.10.2

[lorenzwalthert]

Prepare for release:

• [x] devtools::check_win_devel()
• [x] Polish NEWS
• [x] add tidy thanks.
• [x] revdepcheck::revdep_check()
• [x] update cran-comments.md
• [x] run urlchecker::url_check(".")

Perform release:

• [x] Create RC branch (for bigger releases)
• [x] Bump version (in DESCRIPTION and NEWS)
• [ ] devtools::submit_cran()
• [ ] Approve email

Wait for CRAN...

• [x] Tag release
• [x] Merge RC back to master branch
• [ ] Bump dev version
• [ ] update CRAN speed change monitor PR.We have a new CRAN release coming up 🥳 See NEWS.md for new features.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is how benchmark results would change (along with a 95% confidence interval in relative change) if ca400ad869c6bc69aacb2f18ec0ffae8a195f811 is merged into main:

•   :ballot_box_with_check:cache_applying: 195ms -> 194ms [-3.03%, +2.2%]
•   :rocket:cache_recording: 684ms -> 671ms [-3.62%, -0.21%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:without_cache: 1.27s -> 1.26s [-2.04%, +1.45%]

Further explanation regarding interpretation and methodology can be found in the documentation.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1145 (b02b328) into main (acd0b46) will not change coverage. Report is 10 commits behind head on main. The diff coverage is 100.00%.

:exclamation: Current head b02b328 differs from pull request most recent head f6a311d. Consider uploading reports for the commit f6a311d to get more accurate results

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1145   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.33%   92.33%           
=======================================
  Files          46       46           
  Lines        2650     2650           
=======================================
  Hits         2447     2447           
  Misses        203      203           

Files Changed	Coverage Δ
R/parse.R	87.65% <ø> (ø)
R/rules-line-breaks.R	100.00% <ø> (ø)
R/nest.R	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
R/set-assert-args.R	90.47% <100.00%> (ø)
R/testing.R	69.50% <100.00%> (ø)
R/ui-caching.R	89.74% <100.00%> (ø)

[github-actions[bot]]

This is how benchmark results would change (along with a 95% confidence interval in relative change) if ca400ad869c6bc69aacb2f18ec0ffae8a195f811 is merged into main:

• :exclamation::snail:cache_applying: 164ms -> 167ms [+0.04%, +3.55%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:cache_recording: 606ms -> 604ms [-0.77%, +0.09%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:without_cache: 1.16s -> 1.16s [-0.25%, +0.25%]

Further explanation regarding interpretation and methodology can be found in the documentation.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is how benchmark results would change (along with a 95% confidence interval in relative change) if ca400ad869c6bc69aacb2f18ec0ffae8a195f811 is merged into main:

•   :ballot_box_with_check:cache_applying: 264ms -> 266ms [-1.67%, +2.95%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:cache_recording: 880ms -> 886ms [-1.56%, +2.96%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:without_cache: 1.62s -> 1.62s [-1.71%, +1.75%]

Further explanation regarding interpretation and methodology can be found in the documentation.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is how benchmark results would change (along with a 95% confidence interval in relative change) if ca400ad869c6bc69aacb2f18ec0ffae8a195f811 is merged into main:

•   :ballot_box_with_check:cache_applying: 330ms -> 330ms [-2.56%, +2.62%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:cache_recording: 1.15s -> 1.16s [-1.53%, +2.61%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:without_cache: 2.18s -> 2.15s [-2.94%, +0.68%]

Further explanation regarding interpretation and methodology can be found in the documentation.