Include sticker on the website

[IndrajeetPatil]

And other minor improvements to README.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (17f91fc) 92.16% compared to head (4e64881) 92.16%.

:exclamation: Current head 4e64881 differs from pull request most recent head 96b469b. Consider uploading reports for the commit 96b469b to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #1173 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 92.16% 92.16% ======================================= Files 46 46 Lines 2655 2655 ======================================= Hits 2447 2447 Misses 208 208 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is how benchmark results would change (along with a 95% confidence interval in relative change) if 17f91fc9e62a184f13a217ad1813c2f2e2ad00fb is merged into main:

•   :ballot_box_with_check:cache_applying: 166ms -> 165ms [-3.45%, +2.25%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:cache_recording: 551ms -> 551ms [-1.83%, +1.74%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:without_cache: 1.04s -> 1.04s [-1.26%, +1.16%]

Further explanation regarding interpretation and methodology can be found in the documentation.

[lorenzwalthert]

Thanks. I think {styler} should not be in code font, as that style was derived from help files.

[github-actions[bot]]

This is how benchmark results would change (along with a 95% confidence interval in relative change) if 17f91fc9e62a184f13a217ad1813c2f2e2ad00fb is merged into main:

•   :ballot_box_with_check:cache_applying: 169ms -> 170ms [-1.33%, +3.19%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:cache_recording: 549ms -> 548ms [-1.05%, +0.92%]
•   :ballot_box_with_check:without_cache: 1.03s -> 1.02s [-1.05%, +0.32%]

Further explanation regarding interpretation and methodology can be found in the documentation.