Closed edzer closed 4 years ago
I have a question related to this: is there a consensus approach to handling the transition?
When I use sf::st_make_valid
instead of lwgeom::st_make_valid
in my package I get an error in some evironments (e.g. Travis) that lwgeom is not available. Apparently sf uses it as a fallback in case of old GEOS; the version on Travis is rather ancient - but Travis is a key tool in CI.
Loading required package: sf
Linking to GEOS 3.7.1, GDAL 2.2.2, PROJ 4.9.2
── 1. Error: (unknown) (@test-2-code.R#20) ────────────────────────────────────
lwgeom required: install that first
Yes, that is right, and that will remain the case until the GEOS version having st_make_valid has propagated through all distributions. For such cases you can still change the import, but keep lwgeom
in Suggests:
.
thank you, suggests: lwgeom
has to remain; then all is well...
This affects the following revdeps, who have been informed:
edbuildmapr
(informed by email)