Open Zepeng-Mu opened 5 years ago
Hi Zepeng,
Thanks for trying! I don't use snalemake myself but one of my labmate does and he has figured this out, i will ask him tomorrow and get you back tomorrow.
R
Hi Zepeng,
I get back from my lab mate, he just create another file as output {dissection}/{dataset}/{dataset}.snap.add_bmat.ok
rule snap_add_bmat:
input:
snap="{dissection}/{dataset}/{dataset}.snap"
output:
"{dissection}/{dataset}/{dataset}.snap.add_bmat.ok"
params:
jobname = "{dataset}.snap_add_bmat"
benchmark:
"benchmarks/{dissection}/{dataset}.snap_add_bmat.benchmark"
log:
"log/{dissection}/{dataset}.snap_add_bmat.log"
shell:
"""
/home/yangli1/apps/anaconda2/bin/snaptools snap-add-bmat \
--snap-file={input.snap} \
--bin-size-list 1000 5000 10000 \
--verbose=True &> {log}
echo "Done" > {output}
"""
Let me know if this does not solve your question
Yeah, I actually also thought about this, this seems to be the only way. Thanks!
Hi, I think it makes sense to put the binary matrix in the same snap file as input. However, this can create a "cyclic dependency" when using tools like
snakemake
, because the input name and the output name are the same.Is there any way to circumvent this?
Many thanks