Closed yamachu closed 5 years ago
Merging #87 into master will increase coverage by
0.13%
. The diff coverage is100%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #87 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 83.85% 83.98% +0.13%
==========================================
Files 31 31
Lines 1697 1711 +14
==========================================
+ Hits 1423 1437 +14
Misses 274 274
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
nnmnkwii/preprocessing/generic.py | 99.47% <100%> (+0.04%) |
:arrow_up: |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1649b3c...fbf98a8. Read the comment docs.
Thank you for your review.
https://github.com/r9y9/nnmnkwii/pull/87/commits/78743931b18eb24f1f843a1aaa2f9bc2e844eca3 This commit fixed commit that follow your review.
But still trimming issue remains... What do you think about my following suggestion.
None
f
, b
, or fb
then trim_zeros_frames
trims zeros frames from front, back, or front and backThese behaviors can be confirmed from these commits. https://github.com/r9y9/nnmnkwii/pull/87/commits/80a4a36026247b86b39df2125f69b8bf6b6d4a2a https://github.com/r9y9/nnmnkwii/pull/87/commits/493487b6d711905b6bec042e8f8259fcd426b7e0
Thanks.
Could you put a change log in https://github.com/r9y9/nnmnkwii/blob/1649b3caba671ad203c4d599b5b8b95c168e03ac/docs/changelog.rst#v0019-2019-xx-xx? Thanks!
Docs of trim_zeros_frames says
Remove trailing zeros frames
. But it behaves removing both front and back zero frames because of lack ofnp.trim_zeros
'strim
option.expected
actual
So I thought that it's better to set option
trim='b'
.