Closed antaldaniel closed 3 years ago
Great! A new release in CRAN might be possible in 2-3 weeks but generally speaking publishing new package versions that often is advised against in CRAN Repository Policy:
"Submitting updates should be done responsibly and with respect for the volunteers’ time. Once a package is established (which may take several rounds), “no more than every 1–2 months” seems appropriate."
Well, I don't think that this is a very mature package, and the current 0.4.4. is just very overdue maintainance with the dependencies and recently introduced CRAN policies.
The first submission did not pass, there are no \donttest{} rules, for example.
But if you think you can pick up the get_ghg issue and solve it, we can go for it now.
I can help with sorting out CRAN checks if that helps, just post the check logs here. Adding \dontrun{} to tests that need an internet connection is a good idea anyway.
Implementing the new get_ghg() function falls too far away from my area of expertise for me to be comfortably able to evaluate whether it gives correct results or not.
Here are the issues, they are very minor ones! https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/iotables_0.4.4_20210601_140326/Windows/00check.log
I have now made the most obvious fixes and pushed them to master. The package checks were OK on my machine and on check_win_devel
@antaldaniel @pitkant all checks are passing now on master
, is it now good for the CRAN release?
@KKulma My bad, that I did not close this, and you missed a few emails. It is on CRAN. We even tried to blog about it and get to Rbloggers.
I sent the current version with @KKulma and @pitkant added as contributors to CRAN, because for the preselection of the competition we need immediate news, and this will speed up communicating plans and expectations.
I'd like to blog about the existance of the package, and planned enhancements. I hope that these enhancements will be sent in a new, major release as 0.5 to CRAN in 2-3 weeks, with further blogposts on environmental impact analysis.
As all checks seem to work without a hiss, I sent in to CRAN 0.4.4