Closed majazaloznik closed 2 years ago
Because we dont know they use pxweb. :) Please check if you can use the package (for example with pxweb_interactive, using the pxweb url). If it works, feel free to add it or supply the url here and I will add it.
Sorry, my apologies, I read the rest of your vignette and managed to get it to work. The only problem is I can only get it to work with this URL: https://pxweb.stat.si/SiStatData/api/v1/sl/. But if I use any of the higher level URLs or the root I get the following error:
Error in assert_pxweb_explorer(x = pxe) :
Assertion on 'x$root' failed: Must be a subset of {'SiStatData','api','v1'}, but has additional elements {'NA'}.
I also don't understand what the difference is between the Data/
and PcWin/Data/
paths, they look the same, but it makes no sense they would duplicate everything like that?
This is really strange. I would need to look into that. Since all other pxweb APIs work, I would expect this to be an error on the Slovenian API side. I cant look into it right now unfortunately.
And dont be suprised on what NSI can do with the pxweb API. They do really strange things sometimes.
Haha, cheers for the heads up! I've just gotten a contact there so I'll try to dig up some more info. If you have (or can help me formulate) any questions, just let me know.
I just tried it, and to me it works with:
test <- pxweb_interactive("https://pxweb.stat.si/SiStatData/api/v1/sl/")
Although when looking under data it seems like all 3000 tables are stored under Data/. This is not very user friendly, so please ask them to create a better structure.
Also, the following gives me the same results as you. It is the response from their API that is strange, so please ask them to fix that.
test <- pxweb_interactive("https://pxweb.stat.si/SiStatData/api/")
Also, it seems like a really unstable server as of now:
> pxwg <- pxweb_get("https://pxweb.stat.si/SiStatData/api/")
Error in pxweb_advanced_get(url = url, query = query, verbose = verbose) :
Internal Server Error (HTTP 500).
Maybe tell them that as well... =)
Why do you say it's unstable? isn't pxweb_interactive()
just a wrapper for pxweb_get()
? I mean what would you expect to get on the second line?
Yes. I was mainly refrering to the 500 error code. There seem to be some server problems.
OK, I'll let you know what i can find out, cheers!
Right, so here's what I've gathered: they say they weren't able to set up the API the way it was intended with a database backend but they use the .px files directly instead. Which probably explains much of the weirdness.. The /Data path is the correct one, the /PXWin one they were going to use for sth else, and although it connects to the same data it's best not to use it.
I made a point of demonstrating just how unfriendly the non-hierarchical structure of the API is for users but was told that because of their backend setup implementing a hierarchical setup would be too complicated. They actually used to have five categories but dropped them to streamline publication. Plus it's available on the web app, so they are being user friendly to most users :). 99% this won't change.
I'll open a pull request to add them, hope I've got it right. Checked the API limits with them as well.
Ok. I'm happy to add it.
In the new release (0.15.1) I updated the API file so this is now part of the package. It's on its way to CRAN.
that's amazing, thank you!! 😀
I was under the impression that the Slovenian statistical office also uses a PxWeb API - according to their own documentation as well as being listed on the SCB site here. But they are not listed in the
pxweb_api_catalogue
, how come?