Closed essen closed 9 years ago
Also related to #2.
Should we just add TCP options to the environment like we do in rabbitmq-server?
@essen sounds good.
Pushed https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-web-stomp/tree/rabbitmq-web-stomp-22
A few remarks/questions:
@essen we do want these documented. Updated fallback port is OK, given that we refer to 15674
everywhere).
As for the tests, if you have an idea about adding some very basic tests (maybe something that asserts on application keys without even starting a listener), go for it. But it's one of those things that are a pain to test and pretty much never change.
Pushed https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-website/tree/rabbitmq-web-stomp-22 with the doc changes.
Tests... it's not trivial, so I will leave it at that for now. I want to get something up for most of these tickets first.
Fixed in master.
See #21. Should be a small change to rabbit_ws_sockjs. Not working today so will fill in more details later.