Closed ionox0 closed 3 years ago
As per the CWL spec, SchemaDefs should probably be able to be present using the name: field for OutputRecordSchema
name:
https://www.commonwl.org/v1.1/Workflow.html#OutputRecordSchema
But rabix will only be satisfied if the #fragment is not present (../resources/schemas/bam_sample.yaml),
../resources/schemas/bam_sample.yaml
cwltool on the other hand will only be valid with the fragment present it seems (../resources/schemas/bam_sample.yaml#bam_sample)
../resources/schemas/bam_sample.yaml#bam_sample
The mskcc / beagle team needs this for operator chaining, so hopefully it will provide the correct schema to the DB
As per the CWL spec, SchemaDefs should probably be able to be present using the
name:
field for OutputRecordSchemahttps://www.commonwl.org/v1.1/Workflow.html#OutputRecordSchema
But rabix will only be satisfied if the #fragment is not present (
../resources/schemas/bam_sample.yaml
),cwltool on the other hand will only be valid with the fragment present it seems (
../resources/schemas/bam_sample.yaml#bam_sample
)The mskcc / beagle team needs this for operator chaining, so hopefully it will provide the correct schema to the DB