Open rachit-j opened 8 months ago
Team Review "Aniket Chakradeo" grading "WW3 (rats)"
Team Review ticket containing key Team and individual contributions
[x] Showing key user interaction and learning(s). For instance how you visualized Sorting Algorithm: Bubble, Insertion, Selection, Merge... how you captured Big O, analytical data, usage of Data Structures... And/or, how you provided response and Feedback to user on their success in learning or experiencing your interface.
Per check.
0.87
Freeform comment:
Tanisha demonstrated how she changed what was in her initial plan, and what improvements could be made. Her project met the requirements for sorting and fibonacci.
Individual Review "Aniket Chakradeo" grading "Tanisha Patil"
Individuals Video, Issue(s), Commits(s)
Per check:
(0.87 + 0.87 + 0.88 + 0.88)/3.6 =0.97/1
Freeform comment:
Tanisha was a key contributor to her team, and had several key commits for the backend API. She had O(n) and incorporated sorting algorithms. She spoke about revisions she made based off inputs on their original plan, and also talked about reflections on how she can improve the project more in the future
Individual Review "Quinn Bireley" grading "Luna"
Individuals Video, Issue(s), Commits(s)
[x] Review GitHub analytics for key commits in each weeks during the project, shows consistent participation for 3 weeks
Per check.
0.85
The developer demonstrated a systematic and growth-oriented approach through well-documented key commits and a forward-looking plan for future changes. The addition of a video presentation showcased effective communication skills. Clear definition of the developer's role, thorough exploration of runtime considerations, and exemplary work and communication techniques highlighted technical proficiency and collaboration. In essence, the project reflects a positive trajectory marked by continuous improvement and a holistic understanding of both technical and communicative aspects.
She was well spoken and understood the material presented. Everything was explained in depth and overall it was an impressive project.
Grading
Team
Individuals
Individuals: Check out everyone's commits for frontend and backend here: Frontend Backend
Key Commits:
Tanisha -
Rachit -
Luna -
Project
Project description Link to Plan
Sorting - Algos, Inheritance, Abstraction
Implementation
Link to Frontend Link to Backend
Issues
Reflection
We realized that we had trouble carrying out our ideation to meet requirements of the project. Because of this our ideation was delayed and we had to make up for lost time.
Team Facetimes ! 🤩
Collaboration 💡
Retrospective 💡
This project was a wonderful journey through the different types of sorts and we got to learn a lot about the java process. We wanted to target a lot of things, but for the scope and requirements of our project, as well as the time it took us to ideate and plan out our project, we were not able to completely make a resemblance of our original game: War. However, we believe that we were able to match our requirements for what we wanted the game to have and the requirements that the project needed. Overall, I think we did a great job balancing everything out and trying to include everything that we possibly could. Although our game has slightly deviated from the original war game, and the fact that we were not able to completely finish some goals (ex. different card ranks) due to some crunches and the project requirements, as well as our ideation time, we feel like we have been able to show our knowledge about Java and sorting algorithms, as well as fibonacci, with a lot of growth and improvement. We learned many things along the way, and we cannot wait to learn more as we go on an adventure with the Zesty Rachits!