Closed burgerrg closed 1 year ago
Thanks for the corrections!
I think you're probably right about set-wrapper-procedure-procedure!
. Although I can't remember for certain, I think it must have seemed too strange a name to me at the time, but consistency seems better than an arbitrary contraction.
I reviewed the differences in the csug between Chez Scheme's main branch and racket's master branch and found a few typos and incorrect return value descriptions.
Should
set-wrapper-procedure!
beset-wrapper-procedure-procedure!
for consistency with the getter,wrapper-procedure-procedure
? I know the name is long. Maybewrapper-procedure-proc
andset-wrapper-procedure-proc!
?