Closed rfindler closed 1 year ago
@mikesperber pointed out, offline, that the #%module-begin
that the teaching languages insert puts in a call to test
. It looks like that call is here and that, according to DrRacket is this definition. DrRacket also thinks that the call to test
that's in the diff in this PR, generated by the function make-dynamic-requirer
in "run-teaching-program.rkt" is the same one (although the nominal require is different).
The call in the #%module-begin
, however, is inside a test
submodule, so it seems like the right thing to do here is mimic what the #lang-based languages do, and dynamic-requir
the test submodule.
I've updated the PR to do that.
The language-test (the one that discovered the problem) is passing with this change (and it also has a test case for #203 in it now, too, which also passes).
This tries a different approach to issue #203 that doesn't introduce the bug identified in #205.
It may be, however, that simply not inserting
(test)
is the right move if thedynamic-require
in the body ofmake-dynamic-requirer
already is going to run the tests without any intervention at this level, which would mean yet a slightly different fix is the right one.Meanwhile, this at least passes the two test cases.