Closed shhyou closed 1 year ago
I don't recall why for-each
exists in ISL+.
In the spirit of Robby the czar of backwards compatibility, I recommend not to remove for-each
from ISL+.
@mfelleisen This PR only changes the document to point to ASL, basically removing examples that do not run. ISL+ itself stays as-is.
Here is a screenshot of what this PR looks like.
Can you send me a link to the screenshot’s content?
Never mind. I misread the email.
This PR removes the documentation of
for-each
from ISL+, because it is actually part of ASL.The new ISL+
for-each
doc points to ASL.