Closed LeifAndersen closed 5 years ago
The comment above that line certainly suggests that this is a good change. I think the comment probably dates from a time when bytecode didn't preserve source locations of syntax-object literals.
That makes sense. I don't really see any docs that I should update, so shall I go ahead and merge?
Yes
Before it would give a syntax object with line 155, which is the location of the syntax object in texpict/code. This can mess up variants of typeset-code that track the source location of the top most syntax object.