Apologies if this has already been discussed; I didn't see an open issue about and in light of the (relatively) recent improvements about catching exceptions I wanted to ask for this improvment too, namely that this test case should pass:
(check-equal? (values 1 2) (values 1 2))
and this one should fail with a message that includes printing all five values and something about the numbers of values are different:
Apologies if this has already been discussed; I didn't see an open issue about and in light of the (relatively) recent improvements about catching exceptions I wanted to ask for this improvment too, namely that this test case should pass:
and this one should fail with a message that includes printing all five values and something about the numbers of values are different: