Closed bennn closed 6 years ago
Honestly, accessed seems like it should be its own field. Like:
Because that will very from style to style.
Leif is right, putting ", accessed" in a note is a bad way to add that information. I can remove that example from the commit message.
I'm not sure now whether the note should come directly after the citation, or have 1 linebreak in between. (My preference is for putting it directly after.)
Added a history annotation and updated the commit message.
To be clear: #:note @elem{....}
sticks the elem
at the end of the bib-entry
.
If there are no comments, I'll merge this next week
Add an optional argument to bib-entry to typeset a comment directly after a citation --- with no punctuation between the end of the citation and start of the comment.
Example uses:
making an annotated bibliography, with an element that appears just below each citation
adding "accessed" dates just after a URL, e.g.
(bib-entry .... #:url "...." #:note ", accessed 2018-06-14")
Example document:
Output: