Closed patcon closed 9 years ago
For a while, the kitchen-rackspace driver didn't support this, when Rackspace dropped minor version information from its images. It does again, now, though. Thanks @patcon!
@patcon Are you sure the latest kitchen-vagrant supports this as well? I updated and it appears to be broken now. I'm wondering if maybe they removed the images from the S3 bucket.
>>>>>> ------Exception-------
>>>>>> Class: Kitchen::ActionFailed
>>>>>> Message: Failed to complete #create action: [Expected process to exit with [0], but received '1'
---- Begin output of vagrant up --provider virtualbox ----
STDOUT: Bringing machine 'default' up with 'virtualbox' provider...
==> default: Box 'opscode-centos-6' could not be found. Attempting to find and install...
default: Box Provider: virtualbox
default: Box Version: >= 0
==> default: Adding box 'opscode-centos-6' (v0) for provider: virtualbox
default: Downloading: https://opscode-vm-bento.s3.amazonaws.com/vagrant/virtualbox/opscode_centos-6_chef-provisionerless.box
STDERR: An error occurred while downloading the remote file. The error
message, if any, is reproduced below. Please fix this error and try
again.
The requested URL returned error: 404 Not Found
---- End output of vagrant up --provider virtualbox ----
Ah grr... I was careless in my thinking Martin, so apologies: I neglected that you were depending on kitchen-vagrant
's assumptions. I was submitting what was in my mind a totally minor naming change, not realizing kitchen-vagrant
was being clever with it.
But given how centos upgrades work, I will submit a PR there. (https://github.com/chef/bento/issues/406)
And sorry for the noise Martin. Glad you tested :)
CentOS minor version floats: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/60660/minor-upgrades-and-version-numbers-on-centos
More consistent to just call it centos-6. (For example, providers like DigitalOcean offer images of 6.5)