Closed G-Joe closed 3 days ago
The primary change involves refactoring the ColorsTemplate
component in the ColorsTemplate.js
file. The hard-coded list of color classes is replaced with a dynamically generated array, enhancing maintainability by using a data-driven approach. Additionally, the npm run lint
command in the .husky/pre-commit
script has been commented out.
Files | Change Summary |
---|---|
.husky/pre-commit | Commented out the npm run lint command. |
src/examples/Colors/ColorsTemplate.js | Replaced hard-coded color classes with a dynamically generated list of color classes to render the ColorBubble component. |
Objective | Addressed | Explanation |
---|---|---|
#344: Refactor to improve maintainability. | ✅ |
Amid the code, where colors bloom,
A refactor sweeps away the gloom.
Dynamic hues now take their place,
In tidy arrays, with elegant grace.
No longer static, they fluidly flow,
Our ColorsTemplate, let brilliance show. 🌈
[!TIP]
Early access features
- OpenAI `gpt-4o` model for reviews and chat. Note: - You can disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by setting `early_access: false` in the CodeRabbit configuration file. - Please join our [Discord Community](https://discord.com/invite/GsXnASn26c) to provide feedback and report issues. - OSS projects are always opted into early access features.
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
Can you attach screenshots of the storybook that uses this file? The before and after please?
Before:
After
when I undo the spread operator, when I create an array inisde the function, like the code, below, it displays just fine, do we stick with the spread operator method or this works
const ColorsTemplate = () => {
const colorGroups = [
gray,
mauve,
slate,
sage,
olive,
sand,
tomato,
// Add other color groups here...
];
return (
<div className="p-4 space-y-0.5">
{colorGroups.map((group, groupIndex) => (
<div key={groupIndex} className="flex flex-wrap">
{group.map((colorClass, index) => (
<ColorBubble key={index} colorClass={colorClass} />
))}
</div>
))}
</div>
)
}
see screnshot
when I undo the spread operator, when I create an array inisde the function, like the code, below, it displays just fine, do we stick with the spread operator method or this works
const ColorsTemplate = () => { const colorGroups = [ gray, mauve, slate, sage, olive, sand, tomato, // Add other color groups here... ]; return ( <div className="p-4 space-y-0.5"> {colorGroups.map((group, groupIndex) => ( <div key={groupIndex} className="flex flex-wrap"> {group.map((colorClass, index) => ( <ColorBubble key={index} colorClass={colorClass} /> ))} </div> ))} </div> ) }
see screnshot
We'll need a 2 dimensional array or an object
stored the array in an object and mapped through it, this looks good from my end, let me know
stored the array in an object and mapped through it, this looks good from my end, let me know
Looks good from the code, left a comment about reverting husky file change
also can you edit the description and attach before and after screenshot?
For the husky file, just to clarify, the npm run lint is still commented out, you want it to be uncommmented?
For the husky file, just to clarify, the npm run lint is still commented out, you want it to be uncommmented?
Correct, when you check your PR on GitHub - that change shouldn't be visible
Done, pls confirm from your end
Merging, thanks for the PR @G-Joe
This change resolves #344 by storing all the colors classes in an array and mapping through the array
Before
After
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores
npm run lint
command, streamlining the commit process.