radareorg / radare2

UNIX-like reverse engineering framework and command-line toolset
https://www.radare.org/
GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0
20.2k stars 2.96k forks source link

[TRACKER] radare2 is not as cool as IDApro (Architecture) #1868

Closed Maijin closed 7 years ago

Maijin commented 9 years ago

Architecture

To be done

Done


radare commented 9 years ago

the sparc disassembler from capstone lacks lot of instructions, so use gnu until capstone gets updated

oddcoder commented 8 years ago

I guess I will start working on the PIC architecture from scratch following the instruction set and registers from microchip Section 29. Instruction Set manual at microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/31029a.pdf

radare commented 8 years ago

Awesome! 👍

On 25 Feb 2016, at 19:53, Ahmed Mohamed Abd El-MAwgood notifications@github.com wrote:

I guess I will start working on the PIC architecture from scratch following the instruction set and registers from microchip Section 29. Instruction Set manual at microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/31029a.pdf

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

oddcoder commented 8 years ago

it is time to put a check near the pic18cxx ?

Maijin commented 8 years ago

Already done since a long time :+1:

Maijin commented 7 years ago

@lucasduffey No, idapro doesn't support hexagon officialy https://www.hex-rays.com/products/ida/processors.shtml Open another issue.

Maijin commented 7 years ago

Closing this.

devnoname120 commented 7 years ago

@Maijin Why?

Maijin commented 7 years ago

Doesn't make sense anymore better track needs.

trufae commented 4 years ago

Why is this issue closed? I think it can be a nice place to discuss about which archs. about ST-10:

cannot find any opensource disassembler

Maijin commented 4 years ago

We (You and me) decided to close it in profit of individual issues.

And it indeed makes more sense to discuss and post document architectures individually rather than in a big giant issue.

radare commented 4 years ago

i dont have the time or the source to implement the support for that architecture, and opening an issue that will be closed at some point makes no sense to me, i just dropped this info in here for the future someone to find the links without having to google

On 10 Jun 2020, at 09:39, Maijin notifications@github.com wrote:

We (You and me) decided to close it in profit of individual issues.

And it indeed makes more sense to discuss and post document architectures individually rather than in a big giant issue.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/radareorg/radare2/issues/1868#issuecomment-641795852, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAG75FQAAJANJ3L34CNDRYLRV42CXANCNFSM4AZKBQ4A.