Closed ret2libc closed 6 years ago
@radare I fixed the naming! Please tell me what you think :)
Yeah I couldn't actually think of other cases where you don't want a void* as value. The other naming could be:
HtUU
, HtUP
, HtPP
. What about these?
Yeah sounds better to me. Not sure how many we will have to replicate but looks less confusing to me
On 11 Nov 2018, at 14:06, Riccardo Schirone notifications@github.com wrote:
Yeah I couldn't actually think of other cases where you don't want a void* as value. The other naming could be:
HtUU, HtUP, HtPP. What about these?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
Ok, it's fine with me too. I think we won't need more then HtUU
, HtUP
and HtPP
. They seem to cover pretty much all use cases to me. Of course, you can always subclass it even further, but with void *
as type you cover everything quite easily.
I will rename things soon.
Ok, Everything was addressed.
@radare if you want to rename things this seems like the right moment!