Closed TensorDuck closed 8 years ago
Hey, Justin. Extasy 0.1 is bound to gromacs-lsdmap and amber-coco. Patterns with gromacs-coco can be implemented with 0.2. (it might be possible to have that in 0.1, but I think the idea was to use 0.2 for such new combinations).
That makes sense. I was having trouble installing 0.2 as well. Is it currently in a state to be released and installed?
Yes. Please be sure to use the devel branch (as in the documentation)
Docs link: http://extasy.readthedocs.org/en/extasy_0.2/
Please let me know about any installation issues.
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Justin Chen notifications@github.com wrote:
That makes sense. I was having trouble installing 0.2 as well. Is it currently in a state to be released and installed?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/radical-cybertools/ExTASY/issues/191#issuecomment-142123510 .
@TensorDuck I'm closing this ticket, if you encounter an error with 0.2 installation please open a new ticket.
I get this error when I try running COCO using Gromacs as the simulator.
My .wcfg is:
COCO doesn't through the error when using Amber. I was wondering if this was intended or not? In principle, the lsdm_config_file is not needed for COCO and shouldn't be a required field when using Gromacs.