radical-cybertools / ExTASY

MDEnsemble
Other
1 stars 1 forks source link

ENMD scripts are silent by default #225

Closed ibethune closed 8 years ago

ibethune commented 8 years ago

Using the latest enmd from master, the scripts are silent unless RADICAL_ENMD_VERBOSE=Report is exported. I thought the default behaviour was to use this level of verbosity unless the users specified otherwise?

mbp-ib:grlsd-on-archer ibethune$ RADICAL_ENMD_VERBOSE=Report python 
... SILENCE...
... I killed it here...
(extasy-test)Iains-MacBook-Pro:grlsd-on-archer ibethune$ RADICAL_ENMD_VERBOSE=Report python extasy_gromacs_lsdmap.py --RPconfig archer.rcfg --Kconfig gromacslsdmap.wcfg

================================================================================
 EnsembleMD (0.3.14-1-g46723d4)                                                 
================================================================================

Starting Allocation                                                           ok
        Verifying pattern                                                     ok
        Starting pattern execution                                            ok
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Executing simulation-analysis loop with 1 iterations on 24 allocated core(s) on 'epsrc.archer'

Job waiting on queue...
vivek-bala commented 8 years ago

Sorry about missing this one. This should be fixed now.

vivek-bala commented 8 years ago

master + extasy_0.2-devel branches,

vivek-bala commented 8 years ago

plus I think I'll rename extasy_0.2-devel branch to extasy_data or extasy_docs_data. The naming is confusing.

ibethune commented 8 years ago

Thanks, this is working correctly now. Any reason why the example files etc. can't live in the master branch? Seems to me having one less branch would be less confusing?

vivek-bala commented 8 years ago

Example files are on both the master and extasy_data. extasy_data exists mainly to hold the tarballs.

vivek-bala commented 8 years ago

I'm happy to move the tarballs to master as well.. but it was previously suggested to keep the tarballs in a separate branch.

ibethune commented 8 years ago

I think it's OK as is - as long as we keep the two branches in sync.

vivek-bala commented 8 years ago

Yup