Closed ibethune closed 8 years ago
Sorry about missing this one. This should be fixed now.
master + extasy_0.2-devel branches,
plus I think I'll rename extasy_0.2-devel branch to extasy_data or extasy_docs_data. The naming is confusing.
Thanks, this is working correctly now. Any reason why the example files etc. can't live in the master branch? Seems to me having one less branch would be less confusing?
Example files are on both the master and extasy_data. extasy_data exists mainly to hold the tarballs.
I'm happy to move the tarballs to master as well.. but it was previously suggested to keep the tarballs in a separate branch.
I think it's OK as is - as long as we keep the two branches in sync.
Yup
Using the latest enmd from master, the scripts are silent unless RADICAL_ENMD_VERBOSE=Report is exported. I thought the default behaviour was to use this level of verbosity unless the users specified otherwise?