Closed mtitov closed 11 months ago
https://github.com/radical-cybertools/radical.analytics/blob/b0ce0773e51756cd1c6694973b05c3a3de8346a2/src/radical/analytics/session.py#L860-L865
shouldn't this code be as
t = times[0][0] v = collapsed[0][1] ret = list() for time, val in collapsed: while time > t: ret.append([t, v]) t += sampling v = val
when used the original code as concurrency(event=events, sampling=1) then had less concurrent tasks by 1 (-1) as it should be
concurrency(event=events, sampling=1)
-1
Nice catch, correct I think...
https://github.com/radical-cybertools/radical.analytics/blob/b0ce0773e51756cd1c6694973b05c3a3de8346a2/src/radical/analytics/session.py#L860-L865
shouldn't this code be as
when used the original code as
concurrency(event=events, sampling=1)
then had less concurrent tasks by 1 (-1
) as it should be