Closed andre-merzky closed 1 year ago
Ah, of course, that should have gone to the docs branch. Fixed.
Please commit the notebook without executing the cells.
This was what we discussed on the last call: I did that because I wasn't sure if I should run a session or store a session, so I committed the cells to make it easier to review. I'll change that to running a session (likely not today though).
Please commit the notebook without executing the cells.
This was what we discussed on the last call: I did that because I wasn't sure if I should run a session or store a session, so I committed the cells to make it easier to review. I'll change that to running a session (likely not today though).
I agree we discussed it on Friday but I believe we had agreed for you to:
!
to run example debug commands on the session sandbox(es)I agree we discussed it on Friday but I believe we had agreed for you to:
Yes, indeed - just did not do that yet...
popen.py
breaks the rank test.
Attention: Patch coverage is 16.66667%
with 10 lines
in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 41.44%. Comparing base (
5bab736
) to head (8e96ebb
). Report is 2570 commits behind head on devel.
Files with missing lines | Patch % | Lines |
---|---|---|
src/radical/pilot/pmgr/launching/base.py | 0.00% | 10 Missing :warning: |
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Check out this pull request on
See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.
Powered by ReviewNB