Closed slack-coder closed 11 months ago
It looks like the linter is overly pedantic on the code base about changes unrelated to this PR.
It looks like the linter is overly pedantic on the code base about changes unrelated to this PR.
Hmmm weird that it just showed up.
It looks like the linter is overly pedantic on the code base about changes unrelated to this PR.
Hmmm weird that it just showed up.
It's also not showing up for me locally. Even more curious :thinking:
It looks like the linter is overly pedantic on the code base about changes unrelated to this PR.
Hmmm weird that it just showed up.
It's also not showing up for me locally. Even more curious 🤔
Ah, the toolchain went to 1.72.0, I'll merge this and also push a fix for that
It looks like the linter is overly pedantic on the code base about changes unrelated to this PR.
Hmmm weird that it just showed up.
It's also not showing up for me locally. Even more curious 🤔
Ah, the toolchain went to 1.72.0, I'll merge this and also push a fix for that
Seems like it's a false positive so I've reported an issue here https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/11402
Put the Diff type in lines with its associated types by opening it up to construction by crate consumers. The existing associated types have all their fields public.
Open construction up by making the
Diff::insert_*
methods public and updating the Diff's stats manually.Diff::stat
correctness is covered by existing tests.