Closed keflavich closed 3 years ago
It may be better as a utility function in spectral-cube to avoid a circular dependency in radio-beam (assuming we need to open the cube as a spectral-cube).
Do we have clean specific utilities stashed somewhere already? I don' think so. At the risk of adding too many packages to maintain, a separate lightweight clean utility package could be useful.
Hm, I agree, actually.
I think we need a new repository for this. What do we call it?
Let me know if I need to modify anything or add checks, etc.
OK thanks, we will probably ask for your help. We have to figure out where to put it first, then we'll ask you to make a pull request there.
@rgalvanmadrid has made the following tool to calculate the ratio of the dirty beam volume to the clean beam volume:
https://github.com/ALMA-IMF/reduction/commit/9d3846ff08e80a8c1fe1771d4ff87c3c628ead78#diff-91c493e486904d56f624b0744a0257ec2603050401cdb71aaa9d535316ecc8adR15-R88
I think that should live in
radio_beam
under a newpsf_tools.py
file, say? @e-koch , any ideas on where this should live?