Closed AlecThomson closed 1 year ago
Hi @keflavich, any movement on this PR? I have some downstream packages that would really appreciate this fix being in place
@AlecThomson -- that's my bad for being slow here. I'll go through before the end of this week and get back to you.
In the meantime, restarting the tests on the last run. there were a few failures initially that may be due to this PR; let's see if those persisted after the last commit.
@AlecThomson I think I've fixed the tests. I'll merge this if none of the test failures are related to this PR.
Our tests with beam tables also weren't using the extension name.
Patch coverage: 100.00%
and no project coverage change.
Comparison is base (
3d9ab27
) 79.88% compared to head (5da466e
) 79.88%.:exclamation: Current head 5da466e differs from pull request most recent head aecd8bc. Consider uploading reports for the commit aecd8bc to get more accurate results
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
thanks @AlecThomson !
Thanks all!
A simple fix for #878