Closed stappersg closed 3 years ago
@stappersg: 1/ @reubenhwk stops the development of radvd: https://github.com/radvd-project/radvd/issues/135 2/ Reuben has moved radvd and radvdweb into the radvd-project organization 3/ I have sent you 2 emails the 9 January 2021 (the day of the announcement of Reuben retirement) and one new 11 January 2021 in more https://github.com/radvd-project/radvd/issues/135#issuecomment-757348031 + https://github.com/radvd-project/radvd/issues/125 + https://github.com/radvd-project/radvd/issues/129 4/ You have received an invitation to join the radvd-project organization for your work into Debian. No validation at this time. 5/ Like you can see: https://github.com/radvd-project: "Official radvd organization" / https://radvd.litech.org/ "Verified" 6/ By default, GitHub does not show people in organization 7/ @robbat2 has signed 2.19 builds: https://github.com/radvd-project/radvd/issues/125 + https://github.com/radvd-project/radvd/issues/129
@stappersg I marked myself as public in the organization for you.
While I'm willing to take ownership of the project, I'm not a fan of the BDFL model overall, and it certainly shouldn't exempt anybody, including myself from having our changes extensively reviewed.
As I wrote on #136, I'm looking for more clear reviews before I click the merge button.
As I wrote in #129, if @reubenhwk hadn't lost their old GPG keys, then they could have signed a message stating that myself and @Neustradamus were his picks to take over the project.
I think that it is clear, we can close this issue now.
This issue is for expressing my concern of the undefined state this project is in.
Executive summary: No one is clearly saying I take the lead for the time being
There is #135 with some vague update yes, a rename did happen. Nowhere is any sign of whom did that.
Merge request #136 is not yet touched by some one who has merge privilege.
The thing that makes me most uncomfortable is that https://github.com/orgs/radvd-project/people is empty.