Closed tincher closed 2 years ago
Hi @tincher ,
Thank you for your contribution.
I have a comment on this feature:
If an image has a lot of detections, the labels may overlap one another. It would be good if the user has the option to show the labels or not.
So, please, insert in the visual interface a checkbox. If the user decides to have the confidence level on their images, he/she would check this option.
Hi @rafaelpadilla .
Thank you for the kind comment and the reasoning behind it. I added the checkbock for class & confidence.
Hi @rafaelpadilla
I wanted to check if there is still anything missing or if this can be merged. Have a nice day
@tincher
Thank you for your contribution.
Please, see my comments on your PR:
1) There is missing a space between the class name and the confidence. (see figure below)
2) I think it is better to use the format "class (confidence%)", where the confidence is in % with two decimal places Ex: "person (44.40%)". So, the label would be implemented something like f"{class} ({confidence:.2f}%)"
3) Instead of using the same checkbox for both class and confidence, please, use one checkbox for each option.
4) The option to include the confidence on the image should appear only when there is the option "draw detection". "show confidence" is useless when there are only ground-truth boxes.
5) The checkboxes need to be aligned with the bottom of scroll bar on the left, so the space highlighted in red in the image below is reduced
Please, consider modifying these points.
@tincher This is a really useful feature. Is it ready to be merged yet?
Not yet, I am currently writing my thesis and therefore I am short on time. I will look to finish it 2 weeks!
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
Implementation of #22