Closed alex-s-gardner closed 3 weeks ago
Problem is the others are all <:Selector
and Not is not!
Can we instead make a note that ..
and Not
also exist and work like real Selectors?
Problem is the others are all
<:Selector
and Not is not!Can we instead make a note that
..
andNot
also exist and work like real Selectors?
So Not
and ..
are already listed as Selectors
here: https://rafaqz.github.io/DimensionalData.jl/dev/selectors#Selectors
Yes...they are selectors in the sense of selecting things.
But what you are changing is the docstring the abstract supertype Selector
.... and its not the supertype of Not
or ..
.
We can either just close this, or add the note, but we cant list them as being actually related to Selector
in the programming sense, because they are not.
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 83.84%. Comparing base (
37cd1eb
) to head (969002e
). Report is 7 commits behind head on main.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
Not sure if
Not
should be considered aSelector
or aSelector Modifier
Addresses #721