Create Sprint 101 Summary

Summary of Changes

Provide a brief summary of changes Pull request closes #_

How to Test

List the steps to test the PR These steps are generic, please adjust as necessary.

cd tdrs-frontend && docker-compose -f docker-compose.yml -f docker-compose.local.yml up -d
cd tdrs-backend && docker-compose -f docker-compose.yml -f docker-compose.local.yml up -d

Open http://localhost:3000/ and sign in.
Proceed with functional tests as described herein.
Test steps should be captured in the demo GIF(s) and/or screenshots below.

Demo GIF(s) and screenshots for testing procedure

Deliverables

More details on how deliverables herein are assessed included here.

Deliverable 1: Accepted Features

Checklist of ACs:

[ ] [insert ACs here]
[ ] lfrohlich and/or adpennington confirmed that ACs are met.

Deliverable 2: Tested Code

Are all areas of code introduced in this PR meaningfully tested?
- [ ] If this PR introduces backend code changes, are they meaningfully tested?
- [ ] If this PR introduces frontend code changes, are they meaningfully tested?
Are code coverage minimums met?
- [ ] Frontend coverage: [insert coverage %] (see CodeCov Report comment in PR)
- [ ] Backend coverage: [insert coverage %] (see CodeCov Report comment in PR)

Deliverable 3: Properly Styled Code

[ ] Are backend code style checks passing on CircleCI?
[ ] Are frontend code style checks passing on CircleCI?
[ ] Are code maintainability principles being followed?

Deliverable 4: Accessible

[ ] Does this PR complete the epic?
[ ] Are links included to any other gov-approved PRs associated with epic?
[ ] Does PR include documentation for Raft's a11y review?
[ ] Did automated and manual testing with iamjolly and ttran-hub using Accessibility Insights reveal any errors introduced in this PR?

Deliverable 5: Deployed

[ ] Was the code successfully deployed via automated CircleCI process to development on Cloud.gov?

Deliverable 6: Documented

[ ] Does this PR provide background for why coding decisions were made?
[ ] If this PR introduces backend code, is that code easy to understand and sufficiently documented, both inline and overall?
[ ] If this PR introduces frontend code, is that code easy to understand and sufficiently documented, both inline and overall?
[ ] If this PR introduces dependencies, are their licenses documented?
[ ] Can reviewer explain and take ownership of these elements presented in this code review?

Deliverable 7: Secure

[ ] Does the OWASP Scan pass on CircleCI?
[ ] Do manual code review and manual testing detect any new security issues?
[ ] If new issues detected, is investigation and/or remediation plan documented?

Deliverable 8: User Research

Research product(s) clearly articulate(s):

[ ] the purpose of the research
[ ] methods used to conduct the research
[ ] who participated in the research
[ ] what was tested and how
[ ] impact of research on TDP
[ ] (if applicable) final design mockups produced for TDP development

raft-tech / TANF-app

Create Sprint 101 Summary #3052