Description:
Follow on to #3142
For a high level working analysis as there is a follow on conversation Sept 4
AC:
[ ] A Gitbook with the drafted synthesis has been reviewed.
[ ] PR has been opened containing the final draft of the synthesis.
[ ] Internal Raft Review has occurred to ensure DoD standards and QA
[ ] The content is usable and accessible, meaning it adheres to definition of done standards for design work.
Expand Definition of Done Standards
- It uses [USWDS components and follows it’s UX guidance](https://designsystem.digital.gov/components/), or a deviation is clearly documented
- Language is intentional and [plain](https://plainlanguage.gov/guidelines/); placeholders are clearly documented
- It follows [accessibility guidelines](https://accessibility.digital.gov/) and accessibility implementation notes are documented (e.g. clear information hierarchy, color is not the only way meaning is communicated, etc.)
- If feedback identifies bigger questions or unknowns, create additional issues to investigate
Tasks:
[x] Create test plan for continued research session with Yun
[ ] Aggregate notes from interview sessions to create a top level research analysis
[ ] Delete video recording(s) once notes are compiled
[ ] Document synthesis - Scope (research goal(s)), High-level findings, Actionable learnings, Issues that have to be added to Zenhub, Takeways for future research
Description: Follow on to #3142 For a high level working analysis as there is a follow on conversation Sept 4
AC:
Tasks:
Supporting Documentation: