3224 Audit Logger

[raftmsohani]

Summary of Changes

Provide a brief summary of changes Pull request closes #3224

See attached excel file

log_messages.xlsx

How to Test

Go through the excel file above and see all the logs

Deliverables

More details on how deliverables herein are assessed included here.

Deliverable 1: Accepted Features

Checklist of ACs:

• [ ] [insert ACs here]
• [ ] lfrohlich and/or adpennington confirmed that ACs are met.

Deliverable 2: Tested Code

• Are all areas of code introduced in this PR meaningfully tested?
  • [x] If this PR introduces backend code changes, are they meaningfully tested?
  • [ ] If this PR introduces frontend code changes, are they meaningfully tested?
• Are code coverage minimums met?
  • [ ] Frontend coverage: [insert coverage %] (see CodeCov Report comment in PR)
  • [x] Backend coverage: [insert coverage %] (see CodeCov Report comment in PR)

Deliverable 3: Properly Styled Code

• [x] Are backend code style checks passing on CircleCI?
• [x] Are frontend code style checks passing on CircleCI?
• [ ] Are code maintainability principles being followed?

Deliverable 4: Accessible

• [ ] Does this PR complete the epic?
• [ ] Are links included to any other gov-approved PRs associated with epic?
• [ ] Does PR include documentation for Raft's a11y review?
• [ ] Did automated and manual testing with iamjolly and ttran-hub using Accessibility Insights reveal any errors introduced in this PR?

Deliverable 5: Deployed

• [ ] Was the code successfully deployed via automated CircleCI process to development on Cloud.gov?

Deliverable 6: Documented

• [ ] Does this PR provide background for why coding decisions were made?
• [ ] If this PR introduces backend code, is that code easy to understand and sufficiently documented, both inline and overall?
• [ ] If this PR introduces frontend code, is that code easy to understand and sufficiently documented, both inline and overall?
• [ ] If this PR introduces dependencies, are their licenses documented?
• [ ] Can reviewer explain and take ownership of these elements presented in this code review?

Deliverable 7: Secure

• [ ] Does the OWASP Scan pass on CircleCI?
• [ ] Do manual code review and manual testing detect any new security issues?
• [ ] If new issues detected, is investigation and/or remediation plan documented?

Deliverable 8: User Research

Research product(s) clearly articulate(s):

• [ ] the purpose of the research
• [ ] methods used to conduct the research
• [ ] who participated in the research
• [ ] what was tested and how
• [ ] impact of research on TDP
• [ ] (if applicable) final design mockups produced for TDP development

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.66667% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 91.46%. Comparing base (8d01df3) to head (5c612f6). Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
tdrs-backend/tdpservice/parsers/fields.py	50.00%	3 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

[](https://app.codecov.io/gh/raft-tech/TANF-app/pull/3250?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=raft-tech) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## develop #3250 +/- ## =========================================== - Coverage 91.48% 91.46% -0.03% =========================================== Files 297 297 Lines 8433 8436 +3 Branches 611 611 =========================================== + Hits 7715 7716 +1 - Misses 605 607 +2 Partials 113 113 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/raft-tech/TANF-app/pull/3250/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=raft-tech) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [dev-backend](https://app.codecov.io/gh/raft-tech/TANF-app/pull/3250/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=raft-tech) | `91.32% <66.66%> (-0.03%)` | :arrow_down: | | [dev-frontend](https://app.codecov.io/gh/raft-tech/TANF-app/pull/3250/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=raft-tech) | `92.51% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=raft-tech#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. | [Files with missing lines](https://app.codecov.io/gh/raft-tech/TANF-app/pull/3250?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=raft-tech) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [tdrs-backend/tdpservice/parsers/util.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/raft-tech/TANF-app/pull/3250?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=tdrs-backend%2Ftdpservice%2Fparsers%2Futil.py&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=raft-tech#diff-dGRycy1iYWNrZW5kL3RkcHNlcnZpY2UvcGFyc2Vycy91dGlsLnB5) | `93.91% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [...backend/tdpservice/parsers/validators/category3.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/raft-tech/TANF-app/pull/3250?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=tdrs-backend%2Ftdpservice%2Fparsers%2Fvalidators%2Fcategory3.py&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=raft-tech#diff-dGRycy1iYWNrZW5kL3RkcHNlcnZpY2UvcGFyc2Vycy92YWxpZGF0b3JzL2NhdGVnb3J5My5weQ==) | `97.70% <100.00%> (-0.02%)` | :arrow_down: | | [tdrs-backend/tdpservice/parsers/fields.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/raft-tech/TANF-app/pull/3250?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=tdrs-backend%2Ftdpservice%2Fparsers%2Ffields.py&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=raft-tech#diff-dGRycy1iYWNrZW5kL3RkcHNlcnZpY2UvcGFyc2Vycy9maWVsZHMucHk=) | `77.55% <50.00%> (-2.45%)` | :arrow_down: | ------ [Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry](https://app.codecov.io/gh/raft-tech/TANF-app/pull/3250?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=raft-tech). > **Legend** - [Click here to learn more](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/codecov-delta?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=raft-tech) > `Δ = absolute (impact)`, `ø = not affected`, `? = missing data` > Powered by [Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/raft-tech/TANF-app/pull/3250?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=footer&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=raft-tech). Last update [c230985...5c612f6](https://app.codecov.io/gh/raft-tech/TANF-app/pull/3250?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=lastupdated&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=raft-tech). Read the [comment docs](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/pull-request-comments?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=raft-tech).

---

🚨 Try these New Features:

• Flaky Tests Detection - Detect and resolve failed and flaky tests

[andrew-jameson]

Thank you for the attached spreadsheet, good work!

The bottom 3 red lines here expose case number however I'm not sure case number qualifies as PII so no action needed here? Indeed, wouldn't providing the case number be helpful for analysts to resolve issues?