Alertmanager Cloud.gov

[elipe17]

Summary of Changes

• Updated alertmanager manifest to pull alertmanager binary and start it in monolith mode
• Updated plg/deploy.sh to deploy alertmanager and handle networking
• Fixed some prometheus alert config errors
• Updated alertmanager config to notify receivers when an alert/group of alerts has been resolved Pull request closes #3254

How to Test

1. Deploy this PR to a dev environment. Note for testing purposes alertmanager is deployed in a dev environment.
2. Log in with the CF CLI and run cf add-network-policy alertmanager tdp-frontend-<ENV> --protocol tcp --port 80 and cf add-network-policy tdp-frontend-<ENV> alertmanager --protocol tcp --port 8080 where <ENV> should be replaced with raft, or qasp, etc...
3. Log into the frontend as an OFA System Admin or Developer
4. Verify the Alerts tab is visible and proxies the alertmanager UI when clicked
5. See screenshots below for alerts that fired from the raft environment and the associated emails that were received

Deliverables

More details on how deliverables herein are assessed included here.

Deliverable 1: Accepted Features

Checklist of ACs:

• [ ] AM deployed in the production environment
• [ ] AM UI accessible from any environment (dev, staging, and production)
• [ ] AM alerts fire and route correctly from deployed environment
• [ ] Testing Checklist has been run and all tests pass
• [ ] README is updated, if necessary

Deliverable 2: Tested Code

• Are all areas of code introduced in this PR meaningfully tested?
  • [ ] If this PR introduces backend code changes, are they meaningfully tested?
  • [ ] If this PR introduces frontend code changes, are they meaningfully tested?
• Are code coverage minimums met?
  • [ ] Frontend coverage: [insert coverage %] (see CodeCov Report comment in PR)
  • [ ] Backend coverage: [insert coverage %] (see CodeCov Report comment in PR)

Deliverable 3: Properly Styled Code

• [ ] Are backend code style checks passing on CircleCI?
• [ ] Are frontend code style checks passing on CircleCI?
• [ ] Are code maintainability principles being followed?

Deliverable 4: Accessible

• [ ] Does this PR complete the epic?
• [ ] Are links included to any other gov-approved PRs associated with epic?
• [ ] Does PR include documentation for Raft's a11y review?
• [ ] Did automated and manual testing with iamjolly and ttran-hub using Accessibility Insights reveal any errors introduced in this PR?

Deliverable 5: Deployed

• [ ] Was the code successfully deployed via automated CircleCI process to development on Cloud.gov?

Deliverable 6: Documented

• [ ] Does this PR provide background for why coding decisions were made?
• [ ] If this PR introduces backend code, is that code easy to understand and sufficiently documented, both inline and overall?
• [ ] If this PR introduces frontend code, is that code easy to understand and sufficiently documented, both inline and overall?
• [ ] If this PR introduces dependencies, are their licenses documented?
• [ ] Can reviewer explain and take ownership of these elements presented in this code review?

Deliverable 7: Secure

• [ ] Does the OWASP Scan pass on CircleCI?
• [ ] Do manual code review and manual testing detect any new security issues?
• [ ] If new issues detected, is investigation and/or remediation plan documented?

Deliverable 8: User Research

Research product(s) clearly articulate(s):

• [ ] the purpose of the research
• [ ] methods used to conduct the research
• [ ] who participated in the research
• [ ] what was tested and how
• [ ] impact of research on TDP
• [ ] (if applicable) final design mockups produced for TDP development

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 91.50%. Comparing base (8d01df3) to head (f30fdc2). Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ackend/tdpservice/users/api/authorization_check.py	0.00%	2 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

[](https://app.codecov.io/gh/raft-tech/TANF-app/pull/3284?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=raft-tech) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## develop #3284 +/- ## =========================================== + Coverage 91.48% 91.50% +0.02% =========================================== Files 297 297 Lines 8433 8431 -2 Branches 611 611 =========================================== Hits 7715 7715 + Misses 605 603 -2 Partials 113 113 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/raft-tech/TANF-app/pull/3284/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=raft-tech) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [dev-backend](https://app.codecov.io/gh/raft-tech/TANF-app/pull/3284/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=raft-tech) | `91.37% <0.00%> (+0.02%)` | :arrow_up: | | [dev-frontend](https://app.codecov.io/gh/raft-tech/TANF-app/pull/3284/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=raft-tech) | `92.51% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=raft-tech#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. | [Files with missing lines](https://app.codecov.io/gh/raft-tech/TANF-app/pull/3284?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=raft-tech) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [...ackend/tdpservice/users/api/authorization\_check.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/raft-tech/TANF-app/pull/3284?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=tdrs-backend%2Ftdpservice%2Fusers%2Fapi%2Fauthorization_check.py&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=raft-tech#diff-dGRycy1iYWNrZW5kL3RkcHNlcnZpY2UvdXNlcnMvYXBpL2F1dGhvcml6YXRpb25fY2hlY2sucHk=) | `76.78% <0.00%> (+2.64%)` | :arrow_up: | ------ [Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry](https://app.codecov.io/gh/raft-tech/TANF-app/pull/3284?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=raft-tech). > **Legend** - [Click here to learn more](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/codecov-delta?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=raft-tech) > `Δ = absolute (impact)`, `ø = not affected`, `? = missing data` > Powered by [Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/raft-tech/TANF-app/pull/3284?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=footer&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=raft-tech). Last update [2b3b674...f30fdc2](https://app.codecov.io/gh/raft-tech/TANF-app/pull/3284?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=lastupdated&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=raft-tech). Read the [comment docs](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/pull-request-comments?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=raft-tech).

---

🚨 Try these New Features:

• Flaky Tests Detection - Detect and resolve failed and flaky tests