Open JonStevensWork opened 5 years ago
Totally agree, made a pull request
Hi there, thanks for contributing! I added some comments on PR https://github.com/ragulpr/wtte-rnn/pull/59
Otherwise I recommend reading
Proposition 2.26 and chapter 3.1.1 and 3.2 in particular shows some alternative forms of the loss function. http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/253611/253611.pdf
Is there any qualitative difference to the current form? I'd be happy to see how you arrived at your definition
Hello, when looking at the likelihood function for the Weibull, I derived a different function than you do. Here is your function:
loglikelihoods = censored (K.log(shape) + shape K.log(x)) - K.pow(x, shape)
However when I do this, I end up with a K.log(scale) term as well. Can you explain how you arrived at your loglikelihood function? I can provide my working if necessary