Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
I agree that it can now safely be removed from the trunk, we should move it
into the
tags to preserve the 'original' :)
Original comment by cgalvan1...@gmail.com
on 7 Jul 2008 at 5:34
Yes, moving "trunk/code_swarm" sub-folder to something like "tags/initial" or
"tags/processing" would be great.
This would mark a new step in the project.
But please, consider not doing so before reaching the few following goals :
1) Removing Processing from documentation (move in an "archive" section)
2) Writing a (short) how-to for developers instead, with dependencies (ant &
java-sdk)
3) And, perhaps, releasing an "alpha-tagged" jar in "dist", to permit non
developers
to use code_swarm, as I have noticed that there are actual users without
neither ant
nor java sdk that played with it like a tool : Processing is in a way not so
complex,
much more simple than than installing ant and java sdk for Windows XP for
instance
(with PATH to update, JAVA_HOME to create...) and in Ubuntu, it requires to use
some
"sudo update-java-alternatives -s java-6-sun" commands and so on.
If some of those points take some times or are postponed, it would at least be
a good
idea to write the appropriates issue repports.
I am starting a small developer's guide in Wiki pages, with how-to setup the
required
environment.
srombauts
Original comment by sebastie...@gmail.com
on 7 Jul 2008 at 8:44
"tags/prototype" would do just fine while it is called like this in
documentation
Original comment by sebastie...@gmail.com
on 7 Jul 2008 at 8:57
Please review and complete the HowToBuild wiki page standing for point 3) :
http://code.google.com/p/codeswarm/wiki/HowtoBuild
Original comment by sebastie...@gmail.com
on 7 Jul 2008 at 10:14
I moved trunk/code_swarm to tags/prototype/code_swarm.
Now all that's left is to revise the documentation to reflect this.
Original comment by michael....@gmail.com
on 13 Jul 2008 at 2:24
Most documentation references to Processing have been revised. There may be
ones I
missed.
Original comment by michael....@gmail.com
on 13 Jul 2008 at 3:33
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
michael....@gmail.com
on 7 Jul 2008 at 4:10