Closed dandancheeseandham closed 5 years ago
My understanding is a thermocouple is really the only way to be sure.
Good work - I successfully printed with this. Explains some of their temperature oddities people report around needing higher than normal temps
Getting around to some testing with my Type K Thermocouple:
With my bed using: M305 P0 T100000 B3950 R4700
and set to 60C, putting the bead of the thermocouple between the top of the bed and the springsteel sheet for 10 minutes yields 54C.
With my hot-end using: M305 P1 T100000 B4388 R4700
and set to 220C, putting the bead of the thermocouple between the silicon sock and the heat-block, with bead between the entry for the heater and the thermistor for 10 minutes yields 187C. I sure don't think my printer is that cool, but I'd guess that difference is based on where I'm doing the reading, so it'll be more the delta of the two settings that I care about.
It looks like I already had corrected my bed thermistor. My hot-end thermistor was different than either the standard old or new configuration. I will change my hot-end to match the new suggested config and test again.
I supposed I should do another PID tune too.
(as per FB, repeating here for clarity)
@kraegar
OK, Here is what I've learned.
1) Bed set at 80°C with old value. My IR thermometer reads 83°C in the middle of the bed. Put in "M305 P0 B3950" in the G-code console - Duet reading changes to 83.1°C - perfect!
2) Hot-end set to 240°C. Can't use IR thermometer for this. Plug "M305 P1 B4725" into the Duet. Temp changes from 240°C to 197°C. I investigate further and end up at https://www.makeralot.com/download/Reprap-Hotend-Thermistor-NTC-3950-100K.pdf and learn that we should probably be using "C7.06e-8" as well. Temp changes from 240°C to 219.7°C , which in the absence of measuring equipment (can anyone chime in here?) will do for now for me.