Closed kbrock closed 6 years ago
r? @sgrif
(@rails-bot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)
Rebased to make it recent (but didn't introduce any changes)
@matthewd any comments to make this easier to merge?
rebased to make it recent (but didn't introduce any changes)
@sgrif or @matthewd Any comments to make this easier to merge?
thnks
@kbrock test failures sound relevant. Otherwise I think this is good to go.
Sorry I've been terrible about merging PRs for a while, and even worse about going back over those that I had neglected 😞
@matthewd very sorry to send you a false signal.
Thanks for all the help and hope all is well.
Does this need a :nodoc:
?
module Arel
module Nodes
- class NodeExpression < Arel::Nodes::Node
+ class NodeExpression < Arel::Nodes::Node # :nodoc:
include Arel::Expressions
Does this need a
:nodoc:
Arel isn't really nodoc-heavy, so I think this is fine. :+1:
This is a followup to #435
This strives to alleviate the inconsistencies in the arel interface:
Many nodes can be used in places that are not currently characterized by the current
Arel::Node
. This introduces these common nodes in a way that makes it easier for rails to use common shortcut methods likedesc
,lower
or other common methods.(yes, this is not the sql I would have written, but I was trying to generate sql that I could imagine generating through rails)
Thanks again for being so helpful extending rails and
Arel
to the many needs of your users.