Don't really know how to report this so i'm doing it here as well as by email...
I was going through the new OpenRTB 2.1 RC1 with PMP API an i found something
that seems problematic.
On page 30, table 3.3.13 (PMP Object) one field is called "private". This won't
be compatible with most object oriented development languages as "private" is
often a reserved word. For instance, java doesn't accept this as an object
attribute name.
Maybe should it be changed to "priv" or "isprivate".
Original issue reported on code.google.com by lau.thou...@gmail.com on 4 Apr 2013 at 1:09
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
lau.thou...@gmail.com
on 4 Apr 2013 at 1:09