Closed protonyx closed 2 months ago
I agree with all suggestions, though I was following the conventions in the database secret engine so it might be worth revisiting as well.
I also noticed that the LDAP secret engine is referenced as OpenLDAP
in the code, which no longer aligns with the Hashicorp documentation. Should that be modified as well?
I also noticed that the LDAP secret engine is referenced as
OpenLDAP
in the code, which no longer aligns with the Hashicorp documentation. Should that be modified as well?
Hey, I guess we must not, since it would affect backward compatibility. We need to check with @rajanadar on this. The process is to mark it as a breaking change, but I'm not sure whether it will go in a patch or a major release.
Any additional feedback for this PR?
Fixes a type mismatch bug with the existing LDAP secret engine implementation. Adds full support for static and dynamic roles in the LDAP secret engine.
Vault API Docs: https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/api-docs/v1.13.x/secret/ldap