Open mschilli87 opened 4 years ago
If people would just read the paper in which the method is clearly described and have a look at the tutorial files then this would not be necessary. I would not waste time on it. It is a minimum requirement for everything to read the tutorial and the manual/described methods in the paper.
Furthermore, if you download files from miRBase and manage to extract hairpins from the downloaded files which are 60 nt long then this is clearly a user input error.
It should also be alarming if 1,400 human precursors have the exact same length...
And for every computational tool the GIGO phrase 'Garbage In, Garbage Out' is key for proper results. miRDeep2 is no exception here although over the years we caught many of these faulty usage cases already.
We should have templates to avoid asking the same questions over and over again and allowing us to simply flag invalid requests as such and close them without wasting our time.