Open karl-project-review opened 6 years ago
Thank you for your kind review, Karl. Yes; you're right. In my presentation I happen to only stress Mammals were more prone to being "endangered" soon considering no. of their species protected vs non-protected. I guess you're meaning since Chi square test results for Mammals/ Reptiles were far more significant at 0.05 level should have been discussed more.
In the chi squared slide, consider going into more detail about that the p-value of .038 means about the likelihood of mammals being endangered relative to reptiles. You talk a little about mammals relative to birds, but as the mammals vs reptiles test was statistically significant at the .05 level, it would be useful to provide an interpretation of those results.