rajm / sipdroid

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/sipdroid
0 stars 0 forks source link

RFE: Set rules for contacts and or number ranges. #11

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
It would be really nice if you could set up rules on when to use SIP.

Something like All numbers that doesn't match +45* should use SIP.
(I'm from denmark)

Or when I call Peters cellphone, it should make a regular call.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by martin.e...@gmail.com on 29 Apr 2009 at 3:12

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Right, that's what I was thinking. For now it would be enough to generally 
exclude
mobile phone numbers (at least for Germany).

Original comment by TimoUhlm...@gmail.com on 30 Apr 2009 at 7:17

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by pmerl...@googlemail.com on 6 Jun 2009 at 7:32

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Yes, or simply : specify different defaults for mobile phone numbers vs. other 
numbers

Original comment by remi.tur...@gmail.com on 8 Jun 2009 at 9:58

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Issue 43 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by pmerl...@googlemail.com on 9 Jun 2009 at 8:07

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Issue 55 has been merged into this issue.

Original comment by pmerl...@googlemail.com on 16 Jun 2009 at 12:34

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Added a Exclude pattern field to exclude numbers that match the pattern.

1. enter by type and/ or number
2. types currently supported home,work,mobile

eg. To exclude by type (m,w,h or m, or m* or mobile,work)
eg. To exclude by number (1*, 1800* or any other pattern)
eg. To exclude both (m,1800*)

Binary attached if you want to try before the next release.

Original comment by wavehill09@gmail.com on 16 Jun 2009 at 6:45

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by pmerl...@googlemail.com on 19 Jun 2009 at 8:43