Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
This is what the analyze panel looks like in Arena.
It hasn't got any information that the current mockup hasn't got - except that
it
shows multiple analyzed lines... Do we need this? How could we implement it?
Using a
"combobox on hover" instead of the current label? Or perhaps using a treeview
in a
scrollview?
Original comment by lobais
on 1 Mar 2007 at 9:02
Attachments:
Original comment by lobais
on 8 Sep 2007 at 4:34
A fried of mine uses a windows based programme to analysis his games.
It gives a score for each move (best at the top, with about 10 showing and you
can
scroll down for the rest ) and you can expand each move to show the scores for
the
replies.
Sort of:
(+0.40 5) e4 > e5 Nf3 Nc6
(+0.20 5) d4 > d5
(+0.15 5) Nf3 > d5
(+0.13 5) Nc3 > d5
and then after clicking on the tab after e4:
(+0.40 5) e4 e5 >
(+0.34 5) e4 c5
(+0.31 5) e4 d5
(+0.25 5) e4 Nf6
(+0.20 6) d4 > d5
(+0.15 5) Nf3 > d5
(+0.13 4) Nc3 > d5
etc, The number after the score is the ply checked and the actual interface
will have
the line going deeper than a couple of moves. All updating in real time as the
program searches though the tree.
Good for check "what if I do this move" easily.
Original comment by sly...@gmail.com
on 2 Mar 2008 at 10:37
I believe it is clear, that analyzing takes much more than a sidepanel.
As a matter of fact, to support analyzing in PyChess the UI idea has to be
rethought.
I believe a layout with a left menu similar to that of iTunes and Rhythmbox is
appropriate. Analyzing will have its own item, and there by ui section. This
also
means that it will have its own set of sidepanels.
I have tried analyzing in Babaschess. It offers to analyze a game, and then
makes
crafty spend perhaps 5 seconds on each move. If it find a large (top most) score
decretion, it makes the move as a blunder. This way you can easily see what
parts you
have to check.
Slyall: I think your idea is very interesting. I know programs like Shredder
lets the
user choose which moves to look into, but for most nonexpert users, an 8 ply
search
is probably more than enough, which makes room for a more full search like
yours.
Original comment by lobais
on 2 Mar 2008 at 5:16
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
lobais
on 3 Jan 2007 at 4:18Attachments: