search

ralphtheninja / open-funding

A guide for researching ways of funding open source projects.
696 stars 45 forks source link

Status Update #52

Closed RichardLitt closed 3 months ago

RichardLitt commented 3 months ago

Hey @ralphtheninja - I see this hasn't been updated in a while. Are you looking for more maintainers? Have you moved on from this unpaid project? Would you be interested in someone else taking over?

Thank you. I'd be happy to fork it, but I want to check first.

matkoniecz commented 3 months ago

I see no outdated PRs, see https://github.com/ralphtheninja/open-funding/pulls?q=is%3Apr

51 is only two days old

matkoniecz commented 3 months ago

So I would start from making PRs and consider forking when they are stale for long time.

RichardLitt commented 3 months ago

@matkoniecz Are you also a maintainer? If so, great.

I'm looking at the open issues from a year ago, and that the README hasn't been updated in three years...

matkoniecz commented 3 months ago

I'm looking at the open issues from a year ago

Well, to make PR you do not need to be a maintainer.

ralphtheninja commented 3 months ago

@RichardLitt Hey! Sorry I have been very inactive on github lately. I'd be happy to make you a maintainer to start with and I'll try to have a look in once in a while :)

RichardLitt commented 3 months ago

@ralphtheninja If you and @matkoniecz are maintainers and check it, I may not need to be added. Happy to make PRs and to help maintain this if it is something you want to keep going, though. Thank you.

ralphtheninja commented 2 months ago

@RichardLitt I forgot @matkoniecz was already a maintainer. Also added you though!

Wdyt about maybe cleaning this repo up a bit and converting it to a proper webpage?

RichardLitt commented 2 months ago

I think it's a good idea! However, I have some life stuff going on right now - moving internationally, hosting a conference - and my time will be limited for at least the next few weeks. I'll circle back, just a heads up.

RichardLitt commented 4 weeks ago

Cleaning the repo up makes sense to me. I think merging #49 would be the best avenue for that.

I don't think that making a proper webpage is that important to me personally. The information works just as well on a README.