search

ramadmin / RLSADB

RAM Legacy Stock Assessment Database
1 stars 3 forks source link

F values for 2 west coast US stocks #104

Closed mcmelnychuk closed 3 years ago

mcmelnychuk commented 3 years ago

from Olaf Jensen and Rujia Bi: Two West Coast stocks are distinct outliers and the differences are so large that it must be an error (see below). Do you have any ideas about what might have happened here? Is F maybe defined differently between the two subsequent assessments? NWFSC-DKROCKPCOAST-1928-2011-STACHURA 2011 F = 0.0226 NWFSC-DKROCKPCOAST-1915-2015-SISIMP2016 2011 F = 0.408 AND NWFSC-SABLEFPCOAST-1900-2011-STACHURA 2011 F = 0.037 NWFSC-SABLEFPCOAST-1900-2015-SISIMP2016 2011 F = 0.577

Given the magnitudes, I suspect the values from the 2015 are errors (not just the year indicated, the full time series).

Can you look into these two assessments, compare values with those in published assessment documents, and make any necessary corrections?

ramadmin commented 3 years ago

It looks like the F values from the older assessments were actually ER values. This has been fixed with upcoming RAM v4.495.